<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hedy Fry Opposes C-61</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brendonwilson.com/blog/2008/07/23/hedy-fry-opposes-c-61/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brendonwilson.com/blog/2008/07/23/hedy-fry-opposes-c-61/</link>
	<description>The personal web site of Brendon J. Wilson, a software developer, technologist, and entrepreneur living in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendon J. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.brendonwilson.com/blog/2008/07/23/hedy-fry-opposes-c-61/comment-page-1/#comment-181560</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendon J. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendonwilson.com/?p=419#comment-181560</guid>
		<description>Agreed - if the tide turns in the next election, the new boss will be the same as the old boss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8211; if the tide turns in the next election, the new boss will be the same as the old boss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck LeDuc Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.brendonwilson.com/blog/2008/07/23/hedy-fry-opposes-c-61/comment-page-1/#comment-181449</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck LeDuc Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brendonwilson.com/?p=419#comment-181449</guid>
		<description>I got the same letter.  So... it&#039;s bad (though it&#039;s much like the Liberal bill C-60 -- which wasn&#039;t so notorious, so it therefore wasn&#039;t so bad) and she&#039;ll vote for it if it&#039;s amended.  Unless it&#039;s not.  Or something.  In any case, I&#039;m happy she&#039;s not just going to vote for it as-is just because the Hollywood crapmasters say so.  Besides, the election&#039;s coming, and if the Liberals form a government they can exhume Sam Bulte and bring back C-60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same letter.  So&#8230; it&#8217;s bad (though it&#8217;s much like the Liberal bill C-60 &#8212; which wasn&#8217;t so notorious, so it therefore wasn&#8217;t so bad) and she&#8217;ll vote for it if it&#8217;s amended.  Unless it&#8217;s not.  Or something.  In any case, I&#8217;m happy she&#8217;s not just going to vote for it as-is just because the Hollywood crapmasters say so.  Besides, the election&#8217;s coming, and if the Liberals form a government they can exhume Sam Bulte and bring back C-60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
