Atomic Shredder

I’ve been trying to think a lot about the Next Big Thing, the kind of technology that will usher in widespread change making lives better around the world. Yeah, I don’t like to think small. The technology that most people think will change the world, nanotechnology, is probably decades away; however, I’d like to propose a more important milestone we should strive for before we attempt to build physical products on an atomic scale.

In his classic lecture of December 1959, titled “There’s Plenty Of Room At The Bottom”, Richard Feynman proposed creating smaller manipulators which in turn would be used to build even smaller manipulators, eventually enabling atomic-scale manipulation . It’s a neat idea, but one that has yet to come to fruition. What I wonder is if what we really need is the capability to assemble on an atomic scale; it would seem a more practical goal to be able to disassemble materials, if not on an atomic scale, then at least a near-atomic scale.

In the case of nanotechnology, I wonder how we will be able to assemble solid materials at an atomic scale without having repulsive forces blow apart a work in progress before reaching a stable crystalline state. Historically, it’s always been easier to destroy that to create, so why not use that to our advantage? Given humanity’s appetite for throwing tons of away perfectly good resources into landfills every day, a far more useful technology would be some kind of atomic shredder. Such a device would be capable of breaking down large items, such as consumer electronics, into piles of relatively homogeneous and pure raw materials. Given the failure of recycling to reclaim significant amounts of resources due to the difficulty of easily separating constituent components, this would be a perfect solution.

If only we had such a technology we would be in the midst of a new resource Gold Rush, except this time the prospectors wouldn’t be looking for gold. They’d be looking for garbage.

Great White North

Ashley’s friend Catherine is visiting us for two weeks, so we decided to take a short three-day trip down to Seattle. I’d always thought of Seattle as a cousin to Vancouver, but most of the times I’d visited in the past I hadn’t stayed long enough to really get a feel for the city. This time, I got a better opportunity to really see the city.

One of the first things that always strikes me when I cross the border into the US is the immediate presence of African-Americans. What I can’t figure out: where are all the black people in Canada? Vancouver is less than three hours from Seattle, yet you’d be hard pressed to find any black people in the city. Did the trail of the Underground Railroad arrive at the US-Canada border and Harriet Tubman said “Right, far enough.”? It’s weird.

We visited the usual tourist traps: the Space Needle, the Museum of Flight, the original Starbucks store and the Pike Place Market. We skipped the Experience Music Project this time, mostly because it’s a trip unto itself.

If nothing more, I at least learned the secret of that episode of The Simpsons where Springfield gets a monorail: Matt Groening, the show’s creator, went to Evergreen State College in Olympia, just outside Seattle. The Seattle Monorail, a leftover from Seattle’s 1962 World’s Fair, runs from the Seattle Center to its terminus in downtown Seattle, a mere 1 mile away! Everybody sing:

I swear it’s Springfield’s only choice,
Throw up your hands, raise your voice!
Monorail!
Monorail!
MONORAIL!

Though at first glance Seattle appears to be similar to Vancouver, on closer inspection it seems like every large American city. Huge multi-lane highways feed into the center of town, yet there’s still horrendous traffic congestion at rush hour. The city empties out after 5 o’clock, with the possible exception of the malls in the downtown core. Not a lot of people seem to actually live near downtown.

Maybe Seattle isn’t Vancouver’s cousin. More like an uncle, twice removed.